I am paying close attention to the second-amendment supporters right now. They are barking, and they are known to bite when they're barking isn't heard. Among the comments I'm hearing, people are saying the American Revolution started because of gun control.

The very idea of boundaries and grievances may cause the free world to plunge into a new age nightmare very soon. In the past, England's government punished anyone who asserted their rights, their boundaries. With SCOTUS preparing to rule on our 2nd amendment rights, our leftist politicians and judges are about to be tempted with turning America into a fascist empire.

1.  If SCOTUS rules that government can illegalize firearms,
2.  If federal government then illegalizes firearms,
3.  If the feds enforce~ such a firearm ban,

-or-

3.  If the feds have to overturn state laws to enforce the firearm ban,

...the crime which ensues will destroy America. The government will have signalled for total anarchy. Every criminal will invade every decent person's home, probably looting and running to another state that has gun protection, thinking they can get away with it. Those of us who live with liberals will be in extreme danger.

I came up with a survival strategy. My mom is too old to be involved in this kind of showdown, and so she needs to be protected. I can pretend to be a home invader, a muslim terrorist in the spirit of the revolutionaries who pretended to be native american terrorists, and then I can blow away rioters and dodge the law afterwards. That way, my family won't get arrested for owning guns. It's a one shot deal, but it's worth it. Mom is worth it ten times over twenty.

We have Stand Your Ground laws here in SC, and so unless the Feds enforce a firearm ban, I probably won't have to worry about these consequences until liberals outlaw guns. But in other states where such legislation doesn't exist, we can expect full blown riots and looting by the criminal element. Maybe if SCOTUS makes a bad decision, these states will demonstrate the consequences sufficiently to cause America to rethink things...and we won't have to have a civil war.

I know the Democrats get into office by support from anti-American groups, but just like they left their anti-war crowd whining, they hopefully are sensible enough to not cross this boundary. I'm kind of optimistic about them. They may be crooked, but they're not idiots. They couldn't gain a thing from enforcing a gun ban except the kind of totalitarian power and revenge that third world dictators strive for.

Would these criminals try?

The question for us then is whether today's Western liberals are that craven. They may perceive that they can maintain a grip on that power because of the size of our current government and it's military technology. It would be terrible for conservative revolutionaries to be pitted against military conservatives, but the left may reasonably perceive the potential losses as an effective way to reduce the size of the opposition, increasing its own leverage.

Waco reminds us that liberals are willing to use the military against the populace. Hurricane Katrina reminds us that liberals are willing to seize guns during a disaster. It's not a stretch to predict the inevitable outcome of criminals testing our rights. However, since most criminals and leftists are cowards, I can't see them passing this law without the antichrist himself at the wheel and lots of popularity.

...which brings us to Hillary. If the anti-war crowd wasn't enough popularity to get Democrats to pull in Iraq what they did in Vietnam, then I see no reason to fear them seizing our guns. The world may publicly blame America for Iraq's chaos, but the world knows it needs our intervention to keep the oil industry going. The left just seems to be legitamizing itself by trying to discredit us. Career politicians...that's all.

They're corrupt. They're embarassing. They're not going to destroy themselves. It's when liberals run a country's majority when some psycho gets in office, and that's when government undermines the fundamental principles of civilization. We're half and half here in America.

Daddy has done it. I have finally figured out how to spot a leftist tyrant.

A leftist unconditionally and always only invalidates your feelings. An emotionally abusive person is always on the watchout for anyone in need of sympathy or understanding. The abuser invalidates someone's feelings because the abuser's lack of conscience would be revealed if he didn't. Invalidation can be in many forms.

*  Getting offended or acting hurt to manipulate you into feeling sorry
*  Character attacks, psychoanalyzing
*  Mockery/teasing where it isn't deserved
*  Arguing just to argue
*  Corrective instruction (get over it, move on, quit whining)
*  False accusations (hypocrite, racist, etc.)
*  Pretending to misunderstand you or your feelings
*  Stonewalling (not listening)
*  Getting your ex-bandmate Dave Mustaine to be in your band Metallica's biography to avoid guilt

These responses are only revealed by the substance of what's going on; mocking can be good or bad. To provide you with a working, functional example of invalidation, jump on Youtube and look up Metallica's biography video. After years and years of having a band without Dave, Lars was so obsessed that Dave doesn't like him that Lars asked Dave to appear in this video, where Lars continued to deny deny deny responsibility for how Dave felt about their friendship. Now you know why Metallica sold out:  they sold their souls to MTV.

Now look at the posers defending Lars (or should I say, attacking Dave and his fans) on the web. For every fan of Dave's who thinks Lars should be punched in the mouth, there are about ten posers trying to invalidate that fan's feelings. God forbid Lars actually had to stoop to learning his lesson and turn around and be cool for once. Metallica and Megadeth might have become one indestructible force of metal if Lars wasn't such a putz. No, Dave had to go his own way, and Lars has to die alone.

Just like the worm Lars Ulrich and his poser fans want Dave to believe there is something wrong with him, all leftists (and only leftists) want their victims to believe the same thing. Leftists know that only your blind loyalty and denial of your feelings will enable them to get away with harming you. They are all sociopaths and bullies.

Same thing with Israel and the Middle East. Muslims accuse Israel of being a 100% Jewish nation that stole land from Muslims, despite the fact that Muslims live in Israel! The terrorists attack and smear Israel. It's the same thing as Hitler smearing the Jews. It's the same thing as the religious bigots (who tried to pass as Jews) of Jesus's day smearing Jesus. As you can tell, leftists are always the same regardless of where in the time-space continuum their tentacles have emerged.

Learning Right from Wrong

When I first started listening to talk radio, I was pretty shocked to hear how rightwingers characterize leftists. I had a problem believing it all, and I instinctively did not trust their psychoanalysis. But the more I debated leftists on forums, the more I caught them lying through their teeth. These people didn't bother to even try~ to argue with facts and reason. They sat around like vultures hoping that I would eventually find a fault in myself and give them all of my trust.

This is what we're up against in this country and this life. The criminals are trying to take us over from the personal and political levels at the same time. It's all out cultural warfare, and I will win in the beginning, the middle, and the end.

NNNNUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU! Dangit! Why do Dave and Lily have to live in California with all the liberals?! Why couldn't they live someplace else so I could celebrate while the state burns to the ground??

My sweet little friend Lily, who played video games with me for the past year online, just had to evacuate the Cali fire disaster. Also, Dave Mustaine, lead vocalist and guitarist of the best metal band ever Megadeth, is stuck in Thailand on a tour while his wife and kids are in California. They're scared and need everyone's love and support.

At times like these, Daddy wishes he had the financial strength of Daddy Warbucks. If only I had the money, I would skip college, organize a strike team, and get my people out of this disaster myself. I would rather personally do that than rely on the fat, bloated government to ensure their safety. It makes me angry to have to admit that these corrupt opportunists have done anything worthy of merit.

I hope for my loved ones' safety. I'm calling on my fellow Americans to chip in for the relief effort and show some moral support.

Lily's page:
http://moonlightbunny.deviantart.com/

Dave's page:
http://www.megadeth.com/

Okay...

As a smoker, I get disturbed by pictures of decayed lungs and images of people with breathing-devices implanted in their throats. You don't see me trying to get anyone arrested for doing that. Neal recently posted such an image on his website, and I am a fan of his despite our disagreement on abortion. Neal rules, and if I wanted to, I would make him cry.

Get a load of this...
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MikeSAdams/2007/10/08/jesus_and_genocide?page=full&comments=true
 
Mike Adams, in his recent article criticizing pro-lifers who show pictures of aborted children, reminds me of the movie Dogma. In this movie, pro-lifers are depicted harassing abortion clinics with poster images of aborted fetuses. The female main character starts off whining about how mean~ pro-lifers are, giving the audience the distinct impression that the protagonist had an abortion. Well at least the title didn't mislead us.

Also years ago, Whitey Ford wrote a song which included a verse about how pro-lifers "called (a woman going for an abortion) a sinner and called her a ...." Now, I understand some people do not comprehend that anyone can live without a conscience, but I have to bring this pattern to your attention.

Liberals are not~ hurt by graphic images; they, in my experience, tend to enjoy watching horror movies that feature extreme gore, filth, and death. Now I'm supposed to believe liberals are distinguished people upset by pictures of a fetus? Why aren't they bothered by statistics of 50,000,000+ abortions? You can hardly call me irrational for believing the left is only trying to gain sympathy so that they may use the full force of government to punish and silence pro-lifers.

In the days of slavery, liberals would have been equally bothered by pictures of slaves doing manual labor -- all the while owning and abusing slaves themselves. The Mike Adams of the day would have said the equivalent of, "Let's show our love for black people with pictures of free blacks instead of unnecessarily upsetting their owners with the truth."

It is a typical behavior of criminals to appeal for sympathy where none is due in order to distract others from the amount of heinous, sadistic abuse that criminals themselves perpetrate upon innocents. I believe law enforcement refers to this behavior as "showing your a**." Manipulation is nothing new, but not everyone who is open to having an abortion is going to overreact to graphic images and try to punish pro-lifers. Some people will see the error of what they're doing.

The three responses of someone wrong to the truth

1.  Shock (change)
2.  Demoralization (escape w/o change)
3.  Offense (aggression)

As you know, I play video games with kids online. I sometimes deal with leechers who annoy and harass other players. When the leechers ask for handouts, I like to give the first non-beggar I see a present, and then I say to the room so the beggar can hear me, "The more you beg, the more I give everyone but you." Usually the leecher calls me ugly names as he or she runs away to find a place where he or she can continue begging. This is the demoralization response.

Sometimes kids ask me for favors with quests. Ever had to tell someone you're busy? Well one player remarked, "No you're not," and I deleted him from my friend list. My response was, "No means no." For the next five minutes, this undisciplined kid proceeded to evade the built-in censor to call me four-letter words and tell me I needed anger management. When this happens, you know you're not going to be left alone; the aggressor is attempting to assimilate you, make you apologize, make you feel blame, and make you do what he or she wants. I laughed at this punk for the whole five minutes, told him to make my cheeseburger, and asked him, "So what's it like not to have any friends?" Suddenly he stopped, but I doubt he was the least bit sorry. This is the offense response.

But sometimes people make the right choice. They realize that a video game item or your service is not as valuable as true friendship. They are stunned by this revelation, and they choose to stop doing an anti-social or harmful thing. My sweet asian lady friend didn't get offended or demoralized when I broke the news to her that she didn't love someone she was preoccupied with. She listened, thought about it, and accepted the truth; now she believes there's a better kind of love she ought to pursue. This shock response is why~ people tell others the truth.

So while Mike Adams may entertain this frivolous notion that the truth doesn't do any possible good -- that we should throw it out in favor of befriending who's wrong -- history and experience shows that nothing~ else works better. Putting the truth above relationships is the only way to have real relationships. Don't that sound good to you posers?

Side note: if you're using this as a beginner's guide to being a man, then take special note that traumatized people have a response appearing to be offense but without aggression. Be patient and let this person have breathing room and quiet time to think...even days.

Evil doesn't want to change. It wants to change you.

Leftists resist the truth hoping that good people will give up on doing the right thing. The quips I mentioned from Dogma and Whitey Ford Sings the Blues aren't entertainment; they're just the demoralized response of naughty children who don't want to change or take responsibility for their actions. You see, the insecure criminal desires willing victims and bystanders because they are afraid to risk detection -- hence the demoralized response.

But some of these baby killers are eager to get revenge. If they can demonize the peacemakers who show the ugly truth, then they'll try to get them jailed under the premise that these graphical images constitute harassment, that doing the right thing is unlawful.

I'm winning over a hot asian babe, liberals are whining, and Mike Adams is afraid some baby killer might be offended. It hurts to be you.

I am true; you are not

And now last but not least, I will rip Mike Adams into pieces.

"At first I thought I was sad because the pro-lifers who do not display pictures of dead babies were being lumped together with those who do.

But then I realized I was sad for another reason: Some of my students who wrote these things had experienced abortion firsthand." -- Mike Adams

Haw haw haw, Mike Adams cares~ about the other side~! Haw haw haw! Mike, you're a failure as an insensitive person. Unfortunately, you have crossed the line by trying to imply that those who don't do anything useful for the pro-life movement are somehow superior to those that do. You have assumed~ that I need~ to prove to you that I am~ morally superior, as if the only conflict in this issue is between 13 year olds and their egos.

Man cannot live on shoe alone.

"And so I have been thinking and I have decided it is time for us to change the way we do a couple of things in the campus pro-life movement." -- Mike Adams

Well if you care what baby killers think, then I guess you're going to try to please them. That's perfectly logical...if you're an idiot. Mike, those whiners are not your friends. Just trust me.

"First, I think we can start by replacing pictures of the dead, dismembered fetus with pictures of some live ones." -- Mike Adams

Just like showing freed~ slaves instead of enslaved~ blacks. Whatever helps you sleep. If you don't hate the truth, then you don't have a need to hide from it.

But see, victims compel one's sympathy whereas aggressors only demand to be left unobstructed to do their evil to others. Mike Adams has no sympathy, and I will have none for him when I spend eternity chasing him with my pitchfork. He has forgotten that moral superiority is also intellectual, physical, and eternal superiority.

"Instead of reminding people of what a horrible thing they did in the past when they had an abortion we can focus on what a beautiful thing the fetus is and how much more beautiful it can be in the future." -- Mike Adams

Yes, Mike, now you're pandering~ to the feelings of baby killers, as if talking to someone of a criminal mindset is going to persuade them better than the truth they reject. You've painted pro-lifers who do the right thing as mean people. Any fetus that doesn't grow up to be a fence-squatter like you is~ beautiful.

"Next, we’ll need to convince the kids that if they do not want to keep their babies there are people who do." -- Mike Adams

Right~ like no one's ever heard of an orphanage. Excuse me for being this absurd, but how does someone who doesn't care about anyone but himself convince kids that nice people exist?

"Maybe the key to not hurting those who have had abortions is stopping to remember that they are someone else’s children, too." -- Mike Adams

Osama is someone's child too. No one cares but you. If people are tough enough to take human life, then they must be tough enough to sit in an electric chair.

"And maybe if we would share with them the Good News of Jesus rather than the bad news of genocide, they would be convinced that we are the type of people who should keep and care for their babies." -- Mike Adams

Appeasement only encourages the aggressor.

Let's share the good news about Jesus. Jesus was murdered. Jesus's murderers told Jesus's followers not to preach his message, and then they punished Jesus's followers for disobeying them. Mike Adams' complaints about the feelings of fence-squatters like himself do not sway any sensible person from the sea of blood spilled by abortion clinics.

We don't trust the enemy, and people never will. Abortionists kill babies instead of just putting them up for adoption. If they're not going to let their victims go, if they're going to harass anyone who opposes them, if they're going to use the force of government to silence opposition, then they are barbarian dictators who do not belong in society.

Artificial womb technology is coming

And when it hits, some abortionists are still~ going to demand the inalienable right to kill babies, and they aren't going to answer any questions. You are only going to cause yourself a lot of grief by siding with these losers now. Be an adult.

I will always win in the beginning, the middle, and the end.

Did it ever occur to you television worshippers that you might have to know something other than what's on the TV guide to impress others?

My aunt pretends to be helpless and incompetent every time she wants to get someone to do something for her. It pisses me off to the point I can't even articulate how mad I am. Today, the elderly woman who has never worked decided to question mom as to why she didn't bring her back anything from McDonald's.

Here are a number of responses I could have given.

1.  Why don't you bathe?
2.  Why do you watch TV all day and night?
3.  Why do you leave your dishes in the sink overnight?
4.  No one on earth likes you. Why should I?

The problem with this woman is that she talks back even when she is wrong. Here are what her responses would be.

1.  (ignore me)
2.  Well you play on the computer all day and night.
3.  Why don't you do the dishes? -or- I wash the dishes every night.
4.  Go to H----.

Today, I wrote e-mails to friends, helped bring in groceries, carried grandpa's walker upstairs like I always do and did homework. Last night I played games with kids and gave them prizes. I feel good about myself because I'm a good person, and my aunt is a stinky welfarite because she chooses to be.

My aunt is invested in my family's defeat. My aunt has lived off of others her entire life. If we are incapable of taking care of ourselves, then she gets to say we're no better than she is. If we manage to get out~ of the ghetto, then she has to acknowledge that she is responsible for where she is. Therefore, my aunt has every incentive to undermine my family's pursuit of happiness.

She gives us work to do that she isn't willing to do herself:  take me to my boyfriend's, take me to the library, take me to a restaurant, take me to the laundromat, do my dishes, clean my house, give me attention, fix my television, tell me where you're going, tell me where the family is, bring my boyfriend over, take us here, take us there, turn here, turn there, don't bring your friends over or I'll come out naked (again), open my mayonnaise jar, work the microwave for me, and get ready to go and wait on me.

Now if this was your twelve year old little girl, you wouldn't mind. But my aunt is not twelve, and she doesn't sound cute when she flatters us for obeying her. She sounds like a loser who's excited that some sucker finally gave in to her selfish desires. And that's the only way to get praise out of my aunt. If you don't do what she says, there's something wrong with you because she~ says~ so~.

My aunt does not listen. When you correct her, you get to hear what my aunt thinks of you. My aunt is not the least bit grateful for all the work my mom, my grandmother, my grandfather, or I have done for her. She badmouths us day and night and never ever accepts us being upset at her. We're always wrong, and she's always right.

Can you imagine living with such a person? Can you imagine being so down in the dumps that such a waste of molecules is able to take advantage of your misery long enough to swindle favor after favor from you? Can you imagine feeling abandoned by society to live out your days having them ciphoned from you...from someone who's ruining her own life?

Now imagine getting a decent job that will you can afford to rescue yourself and your mom with. Now imagine your superior behaving just like my aunt but being far more rational and sinister. Imagine that superior ordering you to do something unethical. Now imagine being terminated for blowing the whistle on yourself and absolving that crooked man of responsibility, a favor that only the hardest of people could disregard. Now imagine trying to convince mom not to lose hope again.

I decided to seek help. I joined a bible study group a few weeks ago, and when I told our leaders about my family's situation, the lady suggested we move into HUD housing. I know there are people who need to be told to help themselves, because people like my aunt choose to go down the road to their own ruin. But I can program in two languages, can dress decently, can type 140 wpm, and am in college. I take responsibility for where I am in life and absolve myself of it without remorse in the name of God Almighty.

Society's predators caused my adrenaline problem, a problem 21st century psychology says is a physical injury that cannot be wished away. If you are so convinced that my problem is my own doing, then let's see you refute my abnormal heart rate changes and adrenaline levels. Otherwise, shut your piehole because I'm not in any kind of mood to deal with another apathetic person who doesn't want any friends.

Of course, I realize that this sounds like a big sob story. And since no one is ever sad for a good reason, and since no one's life is ever ruined by others so much that they can't fix it in a nanosecond, there's no reason for you to be concerned about me or mom.

I live, therefore you do not.

You leftists live in paranoia because you don't know who your friends are. Instead of helping those in need, you demonize the victim. I just read the reviews for Rob Zombie's 2007 Halloween, and I have to admit this is the most unoriginal plot ever conceived. First Magneto in X-Men was the trauma survivor who turned psychotic, but now Michael Myers is a victim of childhood abuse too? I know you leftists are paranoid and stupid, and so I have to bring the cause of your paranoia to your attention again and again. If you actually care about victims, you'll know who your friends are because you'll know what criminals are: shameless compassion-exploiting abusers.

And shut up about Bush. President Bush can land an airplane. You can not.

Stupid kids.

Back in the RTCW days

When I was a well-known player on a popular server, I learned the hard way what happens when kids turn adults against each other. I had started my own server, and enlisted a respectable friend as an administrator. This fellow had helped build a community out of the chaos known as Happy Penguin by starting a community forum, repeatedly challenging the punks, and creating gameplay videos for our entertainment.

I caved into a player's whining at the very first incident. My admin had bounced him repeatedly across the walls, and I made the mistake of taking away his administration privileges. I was a confused person at that point in my life. I didn't perceive how hard my admin worked as a person to add to the community. All I saw was what a snotty little kid wanted me to see: a reckless, out-of-control person with power who needs to be stopped. I made a bad choice, and it cost me a good friend...and for what?

Lately

Just the other day, I was moderating on my favorite ET server. One player under my authority interfered with my discipline, and I promptly took care of his business. What aggravated me so much about this situation was that this snotty kid who didn't know how to use power tried to turn a good friend in the administration against me. It was like repeating the past all over again; I knew~ the kid was going to try to get me banned.

And he did. The predictable cheeseball found an adult to take his side and ban me without even discussing the matter with me.

In response, I sent an e-mail to the server's dispute box with screenshots and an explanation of what was going on. I explained that I've explained to sub-admins in the past how important it is not to interfere with other admins' discipline. I explained that I expected administration to confront me when it has problems with my problems.

Lesson for the Day

This is a family value. A person cannot wield authority effectively if he or she has no concept of who to use power against. Bad kids learn to pit parents against one another in order to display dominance and give the appearance of power, just as a rat learns how to get cheese by pulling a lever. This is the same exact problem my family is having with my crazy aunt. She refuses to learn her lesson because she likes being a welfare queen. She enjoys badmouthing a couple poor people who try to influence her for the better because the fat ton of b*tch has given up on life. She'll die alone.

But I won't. I'm going to brag to every one of my friends that I got banned from this server, and all my friends will respect me for doing the right thing.

VIKTOR FRANKL: LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n5p10_frankl.html.

Stephen Covey's successful book The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People turns out to be based on the lies of pretend-Holocaust-survivor Viktor Frankl. You will note the IHR is leftist, but I have confidence in their findings on this matter.

 

Frankl first pretended to be a gassed Jew. Then Frankl tells the world how strong~ he was in the horrible gas chamber...that he comforted everybody~ there and taught them they could be positive about their situation. Frankl says he spent all that time in gas picturing himself lecturing students.

 

Do you feel the pull of the abyss? Let me translate.

"The idea of proactivity, the foundation of 7 habits was developed by a person imprisoned in a concentration camp, an idea that was forged in such a place can surely be applied to most lives, as few people can attest to have suffered more." -- Wikipedia

Read between the lines. Covey and Frankl expect~ anyone who suffers anywhere for any reason to robotically stop feeling pain, and how dare you question their wisdom! While Frankl's words may mean little to you, they trigger the Inner Critic in survivors of captivity. Complex PTSD survivors like myself react to Covey's charade of professionalism and feel-good expectations usually without realizing how impossible his expectations are. The normal response is to feel ashamed.

Frankl strategically appeals to emotion to discourage questioning of his wisdom. By "being strong" in the captivity which happened to others not him, Frankl appeals to our pride and self-reliance in a way that seems right. Frankl teaches us to hate ourselves when we feel pain. Proactivity says we can suffer anything. (http://www.apologeticsindex.org/c13.html)

THE CULT OF MICROMANAGERS

http://www.director.co.uk/MAGAZINE/2007/2%20Feb/liars_paradise_60_7.html

Director magazine confirms what I've been feeling all along. Covey's psychotic brand of leadership is the armchair philosophy of micromanagers everywhere. I remember my former evil micromanager boss admitting to reading Covey. Why would I reach such a drastic conclusion?

I was listening to talk radio one day. A conservative christian commercial for rightfromtheheart.org said "Society teaches us that God helps those who helps themselves. The only problem is these words aren't in the bible!" I realized Covey and Frankl have a difference of opinion with conservative christians, but I didn't understand what was going on until I encountered my first Covey-educated micromanager.

The devils have written their own ideology to propagate their third world empires right here in the United States. If you think that's a big claim, you really have no idea how much money Covey makes or how problematic control-freak micromanagers are. We're under siege. Read on if you think I'm exaggerating.

REFUTING FRANKLISM/COVEYISM

The right thing to do when someone is upset is to validate their feelings, not ignore them, and especially not expect them to stop being hurt just because they aren't gassed Jews. People aren't all crazy. Sure some people don't have an excuse to feel hurt, but what about rape victims? What about people who had violent childhoods? Trauma victims need a lot of care according to mental health professionals on both sides of the political spectrum. The only debate about PTSD going on is how to get care to the people who need it (who are predispositioned not to seek help) and keep the fakes from abusing the system.

Maybe people should~ feel bad when they're hurt because it means they care about themselves. If Covey wasn't trying to destroy that facet of individuality, he wouldn't need to attack it head on. Face it. The only purpose Covey serves is his own self-promotion at our expense. Why in the world would someone expect others to completely relinquish their own sense of pain?

The answer is bullies. Bullies don't want you to show pain, because bullies (sociopaths) are incapable of showing any compassion. Their social mannerisms are a charade. Think about it. Covey and Frankl's philosophy attempts to explain all pain, all suffering as a waste of time and energy.

Covey's philosophy doesn't applaud the acts of charity or human kindness. It oversimplifies them into a cold construct: the lose-win situation. Once you devalue giving, you've devalued love itself. I'm here struggling to get a job and make new friends after being anti-social my whole life, and could you believe some waitress gave me a gift out of the kindness of her heart? Well that's the whole problem with sociopaths...they're in it for the take. They have nothing to give.

Being a career-oriented American means being a relationship-oriented American. Relationships are more than win-win exchanges. Relationships happen when people add to each other out of the goodness of their own hearts...like when Mom and Dad took care of us all those years.

Mom and Dad love you. Covey doesn't.

THE DEVIL'S EMPIRE

http://www.ualberta.ca/~tfenwick/ext/pubs/print/covey.htm

In 1995, the “Chronicles” section of TIME Magazine (Jan. 23, 1995) reported that US President Bill Clinton had met with New Age “personal-growth consultants” Stephen R. Covey, Anthony J. Robbins, and Marianne Williamson in an attempt to improve his governing skills.

Now get this trick. First you're told you're a bad person if you complain when you're suffering. Next, Bill Clinton raises the minimum wage, and if you complain about losing your job or business, the elitists write you off as a whining child: someone who isn't proactive about his or her own pain, an insult to those who have it harder. Therefore, conservatives are even worse for encouraging you to care about yourself by opposing Democrat policies.

How convenient! There's just one problem. Only nazis expect gassed Jews to like gas. Thus, we can write off Covey's 7 habits as the devil's seven dirty tricks to get away with anything. Sociopathic managers use this cult material to control their corporate environments. Being proactive equals being silent, cooperative, and non-judgmental.

Folks, I believe this brainwashing enables terrorist masterminds like Osama Bin Laden to control others to the point they're willing to blow themselves up. Once a person destroys your sense of identity, your sense of individualism and human rights, they can use you for any purpose. It seems logical that terrorists undergo this exact kind of conditioning, or why would they all~ be carrying out barking orders? If it were a cultural phenomenon, then individuals would act regardless of organizational influence.

This breed of evil fosters dependency on authority on purpose.

 

Prepare yourselves to engage the supreme evil of modern humanity. They are the Super Nazis. They'll take your soul, your money, and your life. And you'll~ be a bad~ person~ if you complain.

 http://www.wkyt.com/home/headlines/8556202.html

One of these teenage girls has a drug conviction. The other has an assault conviction. The two (runaways) were on their way to a daycare center for misfits when they used force to escape the police.

First Americans who think they know what's best for America pass laws which caused one teenage girl to become a criminal. Next, she gets mixed up with a violent~ criminal and the two escape our justice system. Can't blame her. I say let her go. Society has done her enough damage.

It isn't right to assimilate drug abusers into society by the force of law. Your misguided concerns (ohhh the children!) slipped into the glove of force are a stumbling block for those who make bad choices.

Doesn't this young lady have enough problems dealing with the results of her own irresponsibility? I guess not. Now she has to deal with the irresponsibility of 30 and 40 year olds who are too busy building their social networks to ask their elected officials to stop persecuting drug abusers. You're not helping.

Matt Towery, Dick Morris, and Eileen McGann are waving the white flag.

In essence, they're right. You can drag a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. Liberals wants terrorism. Liberals want a violent middle east. These three sell-out republicans expect elected officials to put party politics above our immediate strategy in Iraq.

A local county chairman came into our republican meeting saying he voted to raise taxes because the democrats wouldn't budge on the budget. As long as Democrats can force Republicans into political expediency, spineless Republicans will turn their backs on their constituencies. Of course, the same is true vice versa.

The fact that Lindsey Graham (among others) has defected only proves one thing: our politicians don't trust their voter base to support them. In thick times, who do these republican defectors count on? No one.

Meanwhile, liberals (who are constantly amazed at how superior they are to republicans in every way, and you better know so) are capitalizing on the misguided priorities of the American public. Liberals could have gone along with the whole occupation. They could've said, "Women will have rights in Iraq once we're done." They could've said, "Iraq will come out of the third world." No. Liberals said, "We want national health care and open borders, and even if you give it to us, we're still~ going to stop this war."

What are liberals going to do when we have fully mechanical troops? Anyway, so why did liberals choose to be against the occupation of Iraq? Because they don't trust Bush, and they're not gonna trust Bush. Period. It's just like how Klansmen don't trust blacks. It's just like how criminals don't trust cops. They never will.

And I for one don't see why Bush should have to speak eloquently or be popular to do his job. Just what the heck would you do if you were president on 9/11? Why should we trust you~ more than Bush?

Dems and Repubs get replaced over and over in office every couple years. It's not because of what the politicians vote for. The voters replace the party member who doesn't toe the party line. But when political fever hits, politicians get concerned about not having voter turnout. Somehow, they reason that giving the other side what they want will prevent more of the other party's voters from turning out. It never does, but the politician feels emotional relief from controlling the outcome anyway.

Stephen Covey says we all begin with the end in mind. Republicans begin with the silent agreement that they will give liberals anything they want as long as they get something. What did we get these past 8 years? A Federal Do-Not-Call list, Afghanistan, and Saddam's head. The liberals got everything else, killed millions more children, talked down to us the entire time, and will soon ruin Iraq like they did Vietnam.

Republicans need to wake up. Liberals don't care if their president cheats~ on his wife. Liberals don't care if their president fires every U.S. attorney.

------------------------------------------------------

If I ever run for president, I will never put the GOP above America. Forget it. I will dare detractors to rally up their own agenda and vote for my rival. I will egg them on and on and on. I will pay for my rival's campaign with my campaign money. I will make~ everyone know that I am not afraid from the beginning.

And then...my campaign promises and slogans:

Vote for someone who cares about what you want. Vote for anyone but me.
Want someone in office who listens to you? Don't vote for me. Vote for my rival.
I don't really want this job. Vote for someone who does.
I don't fit in with Washington. Vote for someone who does.
Are you concerned about our nation's problems? I'm not. Vote for someone who is.
Want a professional? There's one running against me.

Where I stand on the issues:

I'm going to do everything my way, and you're going to like it. I'm not answering any questions about where I stand on issues. You'll find out where I stand the same way you find out where every other politician stands: when you get a fine or a tax for it.

Aww, don't get discouraged folks. I'll just tax oxygen. Things would be simpler that way, wouldn't it?

In school, those who conformed to the social expectations of professionalism became known as preps. I have observed that this is largely a Conservative Christian phenomenon. What ever happens to those of us who are rough around the edges, we who use straws and eat french fries with our fingers?

Thou shalt put thy elbows on the table

I am breaking from the tradition of extroverted professionals like Stephen Covey. It's great that some people care so much about others that they'd take the time to teach others how to be professional, but I have a good reason not to conform.

I'm not going to give anyone the impression that I could be a sociopath. I don't care what that costs~ me. And just because you preps conform to this stuff, that doesn't make me an irresponsible person.

I find your public posturing highly questionable

Your manners do not impress me. I will observe how you act in secret. I will measure you by how much you respect the life, liberty, and property of others when you are in a position of power.

Remember the story of Job's friends who scolded him for not being well off. If you take this position with me, you will find yourself wanting when bad luck visits you.

Don't judge me through the eyes of a networker

I don't value someone by his or her networking skills, but by how much he or she enjoys his or her work. If you hate your job, it will show up in your personal life. And if you hate your personal life, it will show up in your job.

I will never~ again value myself by how successful I am. I value myself because I reject professionalism for good reason. I already have a faith. I don't need another one, especially one that involves Satan.

It will take more than a society of weak-willed republicans and terrified liberals to make me drink from the glass. And I thought you silly kids had reason~ to be more successful than me. No, you're just corporate sell-outs...the same preps I went to school with. Nothing's changed. You're just scared.

And your fear is guiding your political preferences. That's terribly irresponsible, but this is why conservatives never get excited, and it's why my life is a cool action-comedy that you yes-men wish you had.

Mwahahahaha!

...until I see a body.

Kids, this is a WWE publicity stunt.

If you want to be truly~ skeptical, you'd assume nothing and wait to see an actual carcass with your own eyes, or an autopsy report by a deaner you personally know. If you want to spend your childhood reacting to the corporate propaganda of Vince McMahon, then get out your kool aid, be a Muslim cleric to anyone who has a different opinion, and no one will stand you.

Or, you can keep going until you all grow up to be Democrats and Republicans. Then you can fight over your meaningless differences with my money, my property, my job, my freedom and my future. I'll poke all of you in the rear with my pitchfork for eternity anyway. So go ahead and give South Park more stupidity to make fun of...because they will...and if they don't, then someone else will.

...you begin to become a micromanager.

It's sad that elected~ people believe government can do anything of lasting value to people other than protect us from foreign nations.

Now I'm gonna tell ya something. Liberal welfare programs don't get under my skin. I'm convinced of their ineffectiveness. What gets me angry is how people react if I suggest that these programs aren't effective. I'm not a confrontational person, and I don't like being told I don't care about poor people. So I feel like this. Let em have my money. That way they have no excuse for staying poor.

See, even a fool can see the error of his ways. After a welfarite has a history of personal failure, it begins to sink in that they have no idea how to change their lives. People eventually get this sort of person to warm up and start taking care of himself. Yes, there are exceptions.

John Stossel's recent column highlights David Brooks' big government conservative views. Here is the one line that sums it all up:  "Some lives are so screwed up, it's hard to make them worse." The do-gooder liberal honestly believes that government intervention is necessary to one's survival. And then when government fails, like New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin and FEMA after Hurricane Katrina, the self-loathing micromanager closes his hands saying, "At least we tried. God forgive me."

But let's be fair. Because some government official put sand barrels on the side of I-26, I am alive today to talk to you. So I think a guy like Brooks belongs somewhere in Government Safety where his concerns can save lives. But just so you know...that's no way to live.

Steve Chapman makes several excellent points about conservatives' impossible expectations on immigration enforcement.

http://townhall.com/Columnists/Column.aspx?ContentGuid=74911a4b-bf89-49f6-88c0-29ae25eb14c5&page=full&comments=true

Today, I'm going to ridicule all the comments made against him.

"Well it may be difficult to keep our borders solid, but it will be even harder to pay for the illegals benefits they are already sucking out of our economy." -- Marc of CA

No, Marc. It's economically unfeasible to line the border with troops, disrupting the human traffic that benefits the economy. Why pay to hurt ourselves?

How about if we just take a stab at enforcing the law and deprting the illegals ??? We can never get rid of all of them but we can sure get rid of quite a few."  -- karoden

Fine. Go hunt yourself some Mexicans. You must not have anything better to do.

"Is trying the same arguement all pro-illegal groups and our sop Representatives use.Gee,its just too hard,they will find a way around the fence,and on ,and on.I get so sick of hearing it!Build the d--- fence signed into law and more of it! Put our military on our border,not Iraq's!!Enforce the laws on the books! It can be done.I for one am tired of donating to Bushes favorite charity,mexicans!!!" -- Reenie

Ever since Pat Buchanan found out I have a Mexican girlfriend, conservatives everywhere have been trying to deport her. I guess I can work two jobs and take care of grandpa until I find another date. No sense in trying to persuade people who see government as the solution to their problems. Oh well, I guess I'm better off ignored by my own kind than by liberals.

Btw, I'm the border patrol for Heaven. GTFO, and don't come back without an invite.

You really have some nerve to tell us to pull our troops out of Iraq. You need to be on the DNC forums with the rest of your racist kind.

"Hey, pal-- the solution to the ILLEGAL invasion is NOT to admit defeat-- it is to insist that we change course and enforce our laws before it becomes too late to save America!...I have now ineluctably concluded that Presidente Jorge is indubitably TRULY dense!" -- lodestar

You mean 'undoubtedly', moron. You're so mad that you can't even spell right, and you want to micromanage 300 million people? Do you see why no one wants you in charge now?

Oh no...we're going to lose by invasion! We're all going to speak Mexican and eat burritos! The horror! The humanity! How does a sweaty Mexican mowing grass end up with Donald Trump's towers? Hehehehe, stupid kid.

"Reality is these people broke into our country. The American people didn't invite them. They may come to improve their lives...so what? Improving the lives of foreign nationals is not our responsibility. But it's become our burden." -- Joyce

By "The American People" you mean "The United States Government." I just want that to be clear, because when emotionally-driven political s***starters like yourself talk, you're so blinded by your own ignorance that you mislead children into believing what you're saying.

Unless you can establish what constitutional authority you have to regulate human traffic, then don't spew this poor-me nonsense about immigration. No one is making you network with Mexicans. Your employer is not forcing you to keep quiet about Mexicans working for your company. Your problem appears to be with shared economic responsibility, and that's fine.

If you don't like the burden of paying for other people's education, food stamps, and welfare, then go live somewhere you don't have to. I don't have that problem because I think I can change things for the better.

"I don't give a royal rip WHY they come - they are NOT wanted, or needed. GO HOME!" -- Well, now

Well aren't you~ persuasive? This person must be the smartest man in America. He knows what's best for our country. Just ask him.

So, if we shouldn't bother creating/enforcing immigration law because people will just break it anyway, what other (currently illegal) behavior should we ignore? Murder? Theft? Tax evasion? Have we ever had a law on the books that was followed absolutely?" -- Virginia Lady

Right...just because I don't support regulating human traffic, I must~ be an anarchist. Yep, you caught me. No, actually I'm making fun of you for assuming things.

Steve Chapman is often right in his comments, but on this he is certainly wrong! Illegals find it much easier to come to the US than to work for the reforms in their own country that are needed to make it a land of opportunity.

"Our government's unwillingness to enforce our laws, to build fences, to find (in schools, hospitals, jails) the illegals and deport them is the problem. The benefits hanging out there for them to take are like bananas to monkeys -- irresistable.

In addition, our Christian leaders seem to think that we in the US are obliged to accept this invasion and welcome "the stranger" (if only it were one stranger and not millions and millions pushing us aside). Forget the cost that the middle class pays while bearing the burden of making this country work; we're supposed to smile and hand them the knives to cut our throats." -- Yooper

Yooper, I can relate to you on this one. You see, political whiners like yourself expect me to smile and hand you the government to cut our throats. You want to obstruct immigration, and you don't care what human traffic does to the economy. You don't care that our nation is already interdependent on this human traffic. You don't care if some illegal immigrant somewhere takes care of an old man who can't walk to the car anymore. All you care about is what you want, and screw everyone who doesn't share your opinion.

"How stupid can one person be to put such bunk into print and attach their name to it, forever to invite ridicule? Has this author ever studied the history of the human race he would dare to comment upon? Populations have been controlled throughout history; people have been kept in and people have been kept out of respective national borders. This guy is just another who desires the end of "nations" and attempts to rationalize in support of same." -- Charlie

To answer your first question, you're not a writer. That's why you don't attach your name to the bunk~ you write. You're dying to comment that I do the same thing, but Charlie, I don't get paid to yell at you.

Aside from your desperate comment on Steve Chapman's character, you fail to make a valid argument as to why I should support enforcing any~ immigration policy. I don't care what Rome did about immigration; those pederasts are dead.

And furthermore, don't vote people into office if you want to micromanage. Just buy a McDonalds, manage a bunch of teenagers, and find out why no one likes you.

"And no, they aren't in the fields. Only ONE(1) percent of illegals are in the fields. The rest are taking jobs needed by and wanted by Legal citizens.." -- onceamarine

Okay, kid, you just revealed your lack of understanding of how jobs are created. Congratulations; you get to be daddied.

#1.  Jobs are not a finite resource.
#2.  People create jobs which produce a profit for businesses, saving them either time or money. This is how people negotiate their salaries. It's all win-win.
#3.  I'm rewarding you instead of punishing you by telling you this.
#4.  Therefore, you are a stupid kid. You were never a marine. A marine would know better.

"After reading Chapman's article it suddenly came to me: We have been doing it wrong all along and this illegal alien problem can be fixed so easily. All we need to do is have a worse country here, than any other country in the world and nobody will want to come. Heck, most legal Americans will want to migrate out.

Impossible to achieve? Not at all, just implement this pending amnesty bill and it will not take very long at all to get there." -- LoveUS

Oh really! How long will it take, Mr. Prophet? Don't get froggy if you aren't going to leap. Your readers feel dissatisfied. You got so excited over the idea of America going to crap that you completely forgot that other conservatives hate that snot-nosed attitude and won't put up with it.

This is why I've been a hermit all my life. You people really are friggin stupid. I don't need your stupidity in my life. I might as well be trying to tell environmentalists that humanity isn't a threat to the environment. You're nothing but brainwashed dumbed down, government-educated simpletons just waiting to run this entire nation under the ground.

And when you do, all you'll know how to do is bring ME back to solve your problems.

-------------------------------------

Illegals have a very tough networking job ahead of them. So I don't see why anyone could conceive of them as a threat to the nation.

Conservatives appear to be motivated by the rule of law, and despite their irresponsible comments and poor argumentation, I will not hold it against these foolish kids. I will, however, demand absolute respect for the truth and consistency from them. If conservatives (who are supposed to oppose New Deal powers) do not stop wanting big government security that exiles millions of people and damages our economy, then I have no choice but to declare conservatism itself dead.

There's no reason to treat human traffic like terrorist activity! Conservatives are going to end up wasting tens of thousands of men to harm the economy. I'm glad Bush has better sense than this bunch.

For some time, conservatives have demanded mass deportation and heavy border regulation. Peggy Noonan's response to the new immigration bill is that "Bush has torn the conservative coalition asunder."

http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/

Boo hoo.

When did conservatives become so powerless and concerned with our nation's problems instead of effectively, happily coming across as the problem-solvers? You tore yourself from your principles, and now you are suffering the consequences. It's simple.

When you market your work skills, you're persuasive. When you're marketing your politics, you're a hardball. You're not building support for Reagan's ideas anymore. You aren't conservatives. You're the generation that conservative ideas persuaded to vote republican, and now you don't know what to do. So you do what the liberals do: attack, demand, and attack again. Stupid kids!

I am conservative, and my attack on your immigration position is where do you get the authority to regulate the free migration of individuals? You have no argument, no good ideas. Nothing will satisfy you but power to control who goes in and out of this country, and I oppose that.

If you had any principles, you would realize that such regulation is in the spirit of the New Deal, which conservatism is opposed to. Don't be a liberal and call yourself a conservative. You're wrong. If you control the borders, you will destroy America's population.

The answer is No, stupid.

Now, take it like a grown man or woman. Obsessing over the government's every move is only going to turn you into a micromanager. Our government is so friggin big, that any change in its policy is likely to cause unintended consequences due to the nature of the relationships between federal and state agencies.

Look at the impossible job government has: protecting America from terrorists, maintaining an international military stalemate, protecting Iraq, providing a fair system of justice, and respecting individual rights. Government's performance depends on the decision-making of tens of thousands of men and women. As you can tell, fallible people do not make perfect decisions. And why should they?

I don't envy Bush's job, but if I had it...

I would sit down with conservatives and liberals, letting them give me their opinions. Knowing they would argue, I would act surprised. I'd say, "We've got a bigger problem than this issue. You two don't agree, and each of you wants me to support one against the other. This country is divided against itself. I can't be of two minds to do this job. The wisest thing for me to do is nothing until you two agree."

You'd all hate me then...because I'd force~ you to form a relationship. Neither of you want that. Conservatives and liberals want their way, and that's that. Screw you if you belong to the other side. Screw you if you don't want freedom from the other party. And screw you if you want to "educate" me, as if my decisions aren't perfect for 300 million people.

Stupid kids.

As if we don't all know how that would turn out. Public spotlight would be on you two arguing back and forth...with me pulling a Solomon. Turn by turn, individuals would reveal how little they care about this country, and public opinion would be swayed against them. I would make this event a weekly spectactle, so all my 300 million bosses could see for themselves why stupid people argue over nothing.

Eventually the message would get around: Daddy knows better.

You people don't have the will to do such a thing. That's what makes me unique. Oh you're all proud people. You couldn't possibly stand to hear the other side's accusations and demands one more time.

And yet, what else would win more people to your side?

Daddy knows better.

Think about socialism vs. capitalism in the context of today's job market.

Remember: either you decide how to solve a company's problems to make the both of you a profit, or someone else decides how to solve the company's problems...giving you the work.

In socialism, the government decides how to solve society's problems...giving you the work.
In socialism, the government owns the means of production.

In capitalism, a manager decides how to solve the company's problems...giving you the work.
In capitalism, a manager owns the means of production.

Essentially, both approaches are equal. You are screwed no matter who you let solve the company problems. So if you use today's job market this way, then you are guaranteeing yourself a future under someone else. You have no idea how much your work profits the company, and therefore you have a disadvantage at the negotiating table.

Why socialism doesn't work

You~ are the specialist. No one knows your trade better than you. Managers can only make things work so well, because they're busy with multiple departments requiring several skillsets. So why would a company rely on 1 person to solve problems in multiple departments? Wouldn't that overwork the manager, thereby reducing quality?

You know the truth. The manager makes you~ solve the company problems while he takes the credit. And that's why we all might as well revolt against the norm.

And guess what else? If every employee suddenly started doing the thinking, then managers wouldn't have a job! They have a financial incentive to get rid of you, and they won't risk their monopoly by letting you explore their company for win-win opportunities.

Consider the alternative

Imagine knowing in terms of time and money how much you can profit~ a company. My confidence skyrocketed when I figured out how to save one company tens of thousands of dollars per year.

Just by being skilled, you have the ability to identify problems. Anywhere there is room for improvement is an opportunity for you to measure the costs and benefits to capitalize on. And as long as you're making the company money, the company can treat you like an asset instead of a liability.

Micromanagers can't win. Imagine one of these losers giving Donald Trump a presentation. He might say, "Mr. Trump, I will solve these problems for your company, delegating 100% of the work to subordinates who do not understand the reasoning or the big picture involved in this project. I will instruct them, and they will do perfect work." At best, Mr. Trump would be highly disappointed, because there's three things multi-millionaires do not tolerate:  insubordination, incompetence, and a dubious negotiating posture. Micromanagers have all three.

Smile with me and sing along

We're not gonna take it!
We're not gonna take it!
NOOOOoo, we're not gonna take it...anymore!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etGTo6ggMaQ