Kids, read this.

Learn this. Treat it like the Bible, or your life will be Hell.
http://www.asktheheadhunter.com/
 
I have finally figured out what the heck is going on with the job market.

What's the scoop, Arch?

Employers don't want~ to micromanage a bunch of cookie-cut college graduates. They want competent problem-solvers able to sell them a win-win service. They don't care about your skills or education; they want the $bottom $line.

That means instead of applying for an office job~, I'm going to research how companies use software...then I'm going to measure how much time the company wastes doing tasks the computer could do...and finally, I'll measure how long it would take me to create the software. Yes, I'll create my own job, and know exactly how profitable it is.

It's kind of like going from QuickBasic to C#. Instead of Microsoft managing your code (which guarantees a low-quality result), you manage your code -- which guarantees the potential of a high-quality result.

Now I know how to approach employers, because I know what they expect: results. That's so much easier to please than some supervisor's ego. Isn't it?

I'm severely disappointed.

The typical networker isn't willing to stop a foolish college student in their tracks and correct them. When you say, "I'm looking for a job" they react with thoughts like, "Why should I help you? I don't even know you. What if you're crazy?" and refer you to a personnel department. You end up in the corporate machine that way; someone else figures out what problems the company needs solved, and they tell you to do it.

I consider it a duty as a Christian to correct others when they're wrong. I can't fathom why networkers mislead and deceive children into pursuing the American Employment Standard, and I'm not going to because these jerks are not where I want to be. I'm going to clean up your mess, scold you, and hold you accountable. And here I thought I had problems worrying about meeting people.

Rule #1. Thou shalt not lead thy children to Satan.

That~ will be the deciding factor of whether I do business with you. If you network and tell kids to do the resume-interview process, then I am going to irrevocably cut you out of my social circle. I am not demanding you to correct every kid, but if you never correct them, then how do you know if they're teachable? So read me loud and clear: do not mislead or deceive children.

No one feels safer when the devil gets another mule.

And quit acting like you're the only one who can't trust others. No one trusts you yet either. Oops. I guess you can't expect others to always make the first move. If you fail to use the opportunity a naieve job-seeker presents when they interrupt your urgent, important life, then you have no reward. If you love those who love you, what reward do you have?

Rule #2. Thou shalt not pretend the abused don't exist.

The second rule I'm going to shove onto you is this. You're not going to toss around your conservative crap from a position of financial security anymore.

You're never~ going to say, "A person is where he is in life because of his own decisions."

If you expect others to be Viktor Frankl to be in your social circle, then you can go to Hell. Frankl (from Covey's The Seven Habits) was a Jew who effectively handled the trauma he suffered at the hands of the Nazis. When he won his freedom, he used it. Anyone who expects~ a gassed Jew to be nice or loving has a severe mental disorder.

It's not up to the abused to explain to you people that they've been through a lot...that they aren't like you...that they don't know what they don't know. If you don't like being a parent, why do you breathe? You live for yourself, regardless of how many professional long-term relationships you've developed. It's sad. All that power and you waste it becoming another forgotten statistic.

It's up to you to create a convincing argument as to why you're not going to help someone who needs your help. America needs good workers. God needs good leaders. If you're not going to do either of these things, then get the hell out of my country.

Nuff' said.

While Holmes and Rahe have their own scale for normal people, I made one just for those of you who consider yourselves special.

Stressor and Life Change Units

Me (100)
Being disagreed with or questioned (99)
Not being flattered (98)
Someone accomplishes something without you (97)
Your child blinks without your foreknowledge (96)
International unpopularity (95)
Bush (94)
Cheney (93)
Other republicans in power (92)
Job (91)
Neal Boortz (90)
Family (89)
Friends (88)
The rich (87)
Children (86)
Happy people (85)
FoxNews (75)
Talk radio (65)
Republicans and conservatives in general (60)
Welfare check is late (55)
Traffic (50)
Price of gas goes up (44)
Foreign dictators (6)
Armed killers (5)
Marital separation (4)
Catching husband having affair with intern (3)
Getting caught in the act (2)
Death of a girlfriend, family member, or pet (1)
Victims and having an abortion (0)

If you score below 10, you are at no risk of illness. If you score between 11-299, everyone in your general vicinity is likely to suffer from your complaining. If you score 300+, you will probably forget about all the social posturing you do to appear normal long enough to seriously injure or kill someone.

No one should ever take them in.

Kids, this is the ultimate life lesson. When someone has a bad impression of you, they will reveal the entire depth of their character. Instead of giving you the benefit of the doubt, or deciding not to associate with you, most people act on that impression without any further thinking.

I have a family member who doesn't mean~ any harm when she throws a temper tantrum. She's angst for a little while, but she doesn't keep it in. She lets go of her feelings later. While her behavior is difficult to deal with, she doesn't attempt to harm me in a financial or physical way. That's narcissistic personality disorder: tolerance but rejection of others' negative impressions. So yeah, my family member is slighly preoccupied with how others perceive her.

But some people are obsessed~ with how others perceive them. Some have to be seen as perfect, or rational when they're doing something unethical. To illustrate my point, my latest job released me. My boss needed a rational, perfect way to replace me since he didn't like me, so I gave him one. I told him that he should choose the right candidate. We shook hands when he came to his decision, and I was free of his tyranny.

Why didn't he like me? He got a bad impression of me, and instead of verifying whether his impression was true, or whether I would do anything to restore our professional relationship, he acted on that bad impression. Okay, I'm stretching things; he really was the devil.

No you don't see the devil.

Under stress, people sometimes project negative onto each other. They think they see the devil in the other person. They act on this impression, and then they are surprised when others, who don't share the same impression, aren't willing to go along with them.

Over time, these negative impressions become sacred cows. In the Muslim world, the belief that the USA causes war, that Israel occupies Muslim land, and that killing us is a service to Allah are all negative impressions swallowed without thought.

And so a guy like Bin Laden or Ahmadinejad comes across these sheep. They accuse us, and the sheep believe every word of it. Next thing you know, these idiots are trying to kill us: the great~ Satan.

And if there's anything we know about stupid people, it's that they aren't going to listen~ to us once they have a negative impression.

The big, popular business of seeing evil that isn't there

If your beliefs are in this list of sacred cows, you are a true impressionable idiot. I've categorized this list just to save you time in realizing the truth.

From the Left

*  Environmentalists see everyone else as polluters or as "global warming deniers"
*  Socialists see capitalists as greedy and rich
*  Gun control advocates see everyone else as irresponsible
*  UFO-chasers see the military and government as a conspiring enemy
*  Racists see black people as evil
*  Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson see white people as the cause of black suffering
*  Abortion advocates see pro-lifers as control-freaks
*  Drug war supporters see drug users as evil, irresponsible, or harmful to society
*  The anti-war crowd actually believes we want to steal oil and kill innocent people
*  The anti-Bush crowd actually believes Bush is a nazi
*  Vegetarians see meat-eaters as bloodthirsty monsters
*  Feminists see flirting as male-chauvinism
*  Hillary Clinton sees a right-wing conspiracy
*  My summer school teacher saw Newt Gingrich as evil
*  Tom Cruise and the guy who played Chef's voice see South Park as evil
*  Atheists see Christian decorations on government property as a proclamation of religion
*  Posers think anyone wearing a black trenchcoat is about to kill people
*  Government school workers think homeschoolers are anti-social and anti-government
*  Smoking opponents think cigarette smokers want to give others lung cancer
*  Talk radio opponents think talk radio hosts are coveting the people's~ airwaves
*  Gangstas think cops are all crooked
*  Gay rights supporters see the Boy Scouts and the institution of marriage as discriminatory
*  CBS saw Imus as evil
*  Drugfree.org sees children as evil, stupid, and in need of 100% supervision
*  Free trade advocates see everyone else as opposed to freedom
*  Liberals see conservatives as evil

From the Right

*  Republicans see poor people as the only cause of their own problems.

*  Illegal immigration opponents think Mexicans are invading our country.

*  Government school honor students think everyone else is stupid.

*  Preps think anyone who doesn't show tact is an immoral person.

*  Extroverts see introverts as anti-social.

*  Conservatives see anyone who has sex without a license as a criminal.

*  Christians think opposing the separation of church and state is a good idea.

*  Interrogators think torturing terrorists is effective and necessary.

*  Conservatives see liberals as evil.

*  Sell-outs of capitalism think people don't trust the free market but fail to realize people don't trust anything else either. (This means you, Robert Locke, you jerk)

*  My date's friend thought she was going to meet me for sex at a hotel, so he called her mentor in the middle of the night. My date got a call at 3:00am, and I never had sex. I hate you conservatives.

From the rest of the world

*  Terrorists think we're killing children, causing war, and stealing Arab land
*  Iran thinks we're trying to control their economic development
*  The international community thinks we're overreacting

Congratulations, you're all idiots.

But when you idiots decide to vote or write laws, then you're not just an idiot anymore. Then you know everything, and we're~ idiots.

From the Boortz Reading Assignments:
http://www.wvgazette.com/section/Opinion/2007040715

"When we see politics permeate every sector of life, we call it totalitarianism. When religion rules all, we call it theocracy. But when commerce dominates everything, we call it liberty. Can we redirect capitalism to its proper end: the satisfaction of real human needs? Well, why not?" -- Benjamin Barber

Yes, Ben, if you socialists would let people own solar power and greenhouses, then some real human needs would be met. Socialism robs the poor to give to the rich. The government doesn't need electric power plants. People need that power, and when people can't afford it, you take their power away from them.

I'm all for socialism as long as we rob the government and give to the poor. I'm not in favor of letting government rob others in the process...just rob the government.

Look at public bus systems. First the government robs the poor of buses. Then the government makes the poor work on those buses for $6.00/hr. Then the government robs the poor again by making them pay income taxes. Why won't you socialists give these people their buses back?

I'll tell you why. Socialism isn't about the distribution of income. It's about the monopolization of all property, and when you own everything, you can make everyone work for "their fair share" of it.

You aren't taking my solar power just because others don't have it. You aren't taking my food just because others don't have it. Get off your lazy butt and start helping people with your own work. If you have time to tell America to sacrifice for others, you have time to sacrifice for others too.

You can start with working 80 hours a week like a real man. Once you have about 4 hours a day of free time, you'll realize it isn't that hard to work 40. Then you won't be complaining when every American who has 3 TVs doesn't have health care. You'll understand they have too much time on their hands, and you'll never give a crap about them again.

Jay Sekulow is offended that a school ran a mock terrorism drill featuring Christians as terrorists. Has anyone told Jay that liberals killed 48,000,000 children?

Now Jay says he hasn't seen anything more hostile to religion. No...he started a petition to demand an apology from the school. See, this is why I can't get involved with Christianity anymore.

"We should all be offended." -- Jay

You're a better Christian than I, and I'm an idiot.

That's right. Now that Iran has released the hostages, the whole world loves them. Just look at how easily a fascist state sponsor of Islamic terror can win the hearts and minds of complete idiots.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=446679&in_page_id=1766&in_page_id=1766&expand=true#StartComments

"Interesting how absolutley relaxed all so called hostages look like on all pictures. I think Iran comes out of this full trumps! It has acted with dignity and wisdom and treated the possible trespassers with dignity. Why were the sailors in the waterways right on the border which is heavily disputed and ever changing anyway? Smacks to me of provocation of the highest order." - Nina, UK

No good reason Nina. Iran's fueling the violence in Iraq and funding terrorism against Israel, but hey, when you're born yesterday, there's never a good reason for the victim to be minding his own business.

"Actually some of the right-wing the yanks, far from falling about with laughter, are calling for the sailors to be court-martialled for failing to fight to the death. There are a lot of warlike elements among the conservative pundits who were excited that this was the excuse they were looking for to go to war with Iran. I for one am glad that Blair kept his cool and has apparently accomplished his objective of liberating our troops without amplifying tensions in the region. I doubt that even the sainted Lady Thatcher would have played this any differently." - Richard, wilmington, USA

Somehow, a fascist pursuing nuclear weapons to bring about the return of the Islamic Messiah and world war slips past your radar, yet you manage to detect non-existent excitement among Republicans for war. Here's a clue: you don't live in Iran.

"The president of Iran shows more restrain and a little more common sense than our illustrious politicians." - Loris, milan

What part of "Kill the Jews" is restraint again?

"I think it is great that the iranina government has agreed to free these people. I hope that we can now start a civilised debate withouthaving to resort to threats all the time." - Joe, UK

Sure, Joe, let's go have cake and ice cream with Mr. Ahmadinejad. Why don't you have an intellectual discussion with a friggin dictionary and a history book before you talk to cultures who enslave and abuse women?

"I'm very confused! I wonder which Government is the Tyrant and which is the Honourable one." - Geoff, Birmingham

This isn't celebrity deathmatch, you moron.

"But Micheal our govenrment started an illegal war based on lies. And our USA allies have kidnapped Iranian citizens so I think Iran has made a point to the world with this which may have always been their intention. Without this would anyone have even discussed the Iranians kidnapped by USA soldiers?" - Gary, Manchester

But Gary, your government allows people to kill babies. Don't come up with inconvenient truths because the truth is not in you. We didn't kidnap Iranian citizens; we captured Iranian military operatives in Iraq for aggravating tensions there. The only liar is you.

---------------------------------------------------

As long as you stupid kids hold such a low opinion of 21st century GI Joes, fascists like Ahmadinejad will always fascinate you. And no, that doesn't mean fascism is amazing. It means you're amazingly dumb.

And because of your stupidity, suicide bombers will continue to kill children, religious people, and working men and women. Guess what you have to do if they get killed? That's right. You have to draw a welfare check from somebody else. So you see...this affects you~.

A world-class nutcase does 1 thing people like, and now everyone thinks he's a superstar. Holy Christ you people are more ignorant than ever.

Good parenting implies perfection, but effective parenting implies results. Today we're going to talk about effective parenting, because I left my perfect brain in my perfect body...somewhere in Honolulu with a perfect supermodel.

Disclaimer

As long as people rely on others to do the thinking, they will be challenged when dealing with situations they haven't been lectured on. Of course, if we don't listen to anyone then we don't learn from others.

So whatever you decide to learn here today, pull it apart until you understand how it works like a scientist.

With that said, let's make fun of the idiots who think they know everything about parenting.

OMG we're parents yay now we got 2 be all adult and stuff

1.  "Well my kid is going to say Yes Sir and No Sir or he'll be punished. Too many kids today think they can do whatever they want, well not my kid. I'm going to make sure my child understands the meaning of the word discipline. It's better for him this way, because he'll miss a lot of life opportunities unless he knows how to respect authority." 

There are people who earn jobs having authority, and then there is you.

2.  "There's too much fighting in the world, and the home should be a peaceful place. Everyone should respect everyone else's opinion. Good manners make a child into a good person. Children always treat others the way their parents treat them. Always pay attention when your child is speaking. If you respect your child, your child will respect you."

You don't respect anyone, liar.

3.  "A child who gets beaten turns into a bully."

I wouldn't beat any other kind of child because I wouldn't enjoy it.

4.  "You have to ask children where they are going, who they are going out with, and when they're going to be back. Because if you don't, then they are going to get into trouble. Even though some parents object, strict rules don't alienate kids. Even if the kids get cranky, they know your rules mean you care.

Tell your kid you do not want him or her to do drugs. By doing this, you reduce the chance your kid will use drugs now or later in life. That's a good excuse your kid can fall back on if he or she is tempted, because he or she doesn't have a sense of individuality (and those are dangerous, gosh.)"

Punishments should be reasonable to the violation. Children should always be supervised, even after school. So if your kid breaks this rule, a good punishment is loss of TV time :) cuz kids are miserable w/o TV. Haha, we're smart!"

As long as we aren't these DrugFree.org nazis, kids will love us. And you thought this was going to be hard.

5.   "Here's how to lie to yourself so you'll be okay with being a nazi instead of a parent. Monitoring your kids isn't because you don't trust them, it's because you care. Ask your child in a condescending tone, 'What are you up~ to~ tomorrow~?' after dinner so your child knows its impossible to earn the slightest amount of your trust no matter how good he or she is. That's easy, isn't it? Parents shouldn't trust children or anyone else for that matter.

Monitoring just gets more and more important as your child becomes susceptible to peer pressure. Why does that happen anyway? Oh well, who cares. Let's just track the little rats until they're old enough to throw out the house, and then we're done with them. We tried."

Kids, if you have turned to drugs to cope with parents like these, I understand. You are doing things you would not normally do because you have been psychologically abused. You might not trust the police to help you. You might not trust anyone. You probably expect things to get worse if you try to get help. In fact, you don't want help because if you have to tell~ people what's wrong, they really don't want to help. So what good are they?

And that's what makes you Daddy's tough kid. You don't expect help, and when people stare you in the face, talking about nonsense you could care less about, you just tell them to shut up. They're stupid. They oughtta shut about themselves and listen to you, or at least look at you when they're talking. You know you're not okay, you're not trying to hide the fact that you aren't okay, and nobody notices.

What kind of liar tells a kid to expect help from a nation that killed 48,000,000 children anyway? A fat liar.

So for the rest of you who don't have horrible families, remember that freedom only comes from justice. Don't expect victims to tell you, "Hi, I am a victim. Please help me." Haven't you rich slobs ever heard of stress? Start listening to more than people's mouths.

Daddy has fruitmeatcakeloaf for all.

Just look at how weak you people are against one~ bully.

With Democrats and Republicans at odds here, Iran perceives a weak enemy that will totally compromise its objectives. Iran sees the western alliance as unpopular. And what do bullies do to those who are unpopular? They do anything they want.

Iran knows it can get away with kidnapping UK soldiers and demonizing them. Iran has been killing alliance forces, supplying terrorists, and undermining the war effort...all under blatant acceptance by liberals and world leaders.

Some war reporters in the blogosphere mistakenly believe Iran has no sense of self-preservation. While this is true for suicide bombers, Iran's leaders have a bully mentality. Their vulgar display of power pressures regular people via stress to project traits onto the aggressor which can rationalize the aggressor's victory. So if you feel helpless, then you probably are already looking for ways to explain your helplessness instead of fighting the aggressor.

You get that conditioning from living in your own country. Liberals don't feel the same way because they're nutty.

Bullies, on the other hand, hope you see them as powerful because then they can win without further confrontation. To a bully, the longer a confrontation lasts, the worse things get.

You could've learned this at school, but you were too busy pretending bullying doesn't exist.

 http://www.emilykeyes.com/

Just look at her face. She's gone now, and no one will ever see her again. Better yet, everyone will stick their heads in the ground, change the channel, and "go on with life" whatever that means.

But not before you idiots out there blame Limp Bizkit for school violence.
http://www.thetrenchcoat.com/categories/40-Santee

You think that a psycho is just being "tormented" by other students. In other words, you think the students deserve to be murdered for offending anyone. This is why your opinion has no value whatsoever to the discussion of how to end school violence, moron. It's liberals like you who embolden predators with your ignorance.

Let me enlighten you conservatives on some things. Liberals, the narcissist morons they are, punish the aggressor and~ the victim~ anytime a fight breaks out in school. Meanwhile, everyone assumes the victim is as guilty as the aggressor because "it takes two to tango." Until a Jew, Christian, or Republican punishes a victim, liberals won't have a problem with it...and even then, liberals would still excuse themselves.

If you read this, you'll see the same kind of mockery you hear everywhere else in the conservative world.
http://www.mykidsdeservebetter.com/blog/

If you don't understand why that's funny, then either 1) you are a narcissist or 2) you've never met~ a narcissist. Liberalism is really narcissism, as described by the DSM-IV. Alan Colmes is not the best representation of liberalism. He acts like others have feelings. A true narcissist has no such manners; they're loony, and they expect everyone else to care. That's right: a migraine.

For so many people to mock this type of attitude, narcissism is the biggest epidemic of the era.

Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Neal Boortz, and pretty much everyone else has made fun of these useless idiots as long as I've known their names. Just read about the war protesters crying~ outside Nancy Pelosi's office over her not voting for an immediate pullout from Iraq. They truly believe all the bad things we hear about the war. These emotional idiots are the true~ narcissists.

The smart liberals are the dangerous ones for one key reason. True narcissists are merely hapless idiots. They don't mean any real harm or have a mean streak in them. They're 6 year olds who have fits. Intelligent liberals are manipulative, deceitful, possess charm, and~ malevolent. And there are 50 million of them voting themselves largess.

Our liberals are bad, being that they possess the same delusions of grandeur as crazy people, but the liberals are worse elsewhere.

Humanity needs a cure.

The Problems of Tomorrow...Tomorrow

 http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_032107/content/01125106.guest.html

Arnold's representation of the people philosophy reflects what a lot of sell-out republicans do when they hit office. Instead of pushing for meaningful reforms, they settle for fixing and, ultimately, expanding the burgeoise system. I recall attending a county meeting where one of our county chairmen admitted to raising taxes to ensure that public schools weren't overcrowded. Since Democrats wouldn't budge on the budget, he felt he had to compromise to avoid consequences.

Arnold's compromise on health care (liberalization) will create a future problem in overusage of services. The cost per individual will rise to a certain point that people can stand, and then (by refusing to budge) the people will force the quality of the service down to avoid having to pay more. Arnold won't be around to have to deal with it, but the next generation will, just like in Canada.

And once that service's quality is run under the ground, liberals will say, "We're happy with what we've got. We don't need anymore. Just keep funding it, keep increasing taxes, and keep this system just the way it is." After that, health care workers future employment possibilities will be as restricted as public sector teachers; they'll be stuck in an industry that works them harder and harder for the bottom dollar. They'll want better.
 
And to get a better life, a better income, they'll go to government. They'll unionize. They'll vote Democrat and get what they want, and we'll pay for it. And tomorrow's Democrats and Republicans will pat themselves on the back for making people happy, with my money no less. There's just one problem.

You twits are ruining your lives and everyone else's.

Liberals don't program government to ensure their survival. They program government to ensure no one survives independently. Imagine if all the productive people owned enough food, water, housing, and electricity to support themselves. Never-do-wells would have to work to obtain these things. So instead, they would force those productive people out of their homes and into the factories to build them their own houses and then make them clean them.

Schwarzenneger parades himself as a proud sugar daddy, but there is only one direction socialism takes civilization: slavery. And since Arnold isn't willing to do anything about that, someone has to stop the beast in its tracks.

The liberal menace has been single-minded in its abuse and enslavement of the individual to procure its own survival. So I too will be single-minded in the enslavement of big government. There is no compromise. Slavery must be prevented.

Not one stone will be left...

I never realized how much my grandparents' family reflects America. My grandparents worked hard all their lives while one of their daughters, my aunt, lived off their labors. Even after my grandmother passed away, my aunt watches TV everyday and eats the taxpayer. She's never worked, refuses to clean, and expects the house's residents to take care of her every desire. My grandma left her ownership of the house.

She gets groceries from grandpa.  When the two of them lived alone, he would herd her into helping out with things. Since he's gotten too old to take care of himself, she does even less. She walks around the house without clothes sometimes, even if someone is around. She doesn't do her own dishes; she leaves them in the sink for her sister to. And when she lifts a finger, everyone in the house has to know it. She badmouths her sister and harasses her for favors every day. My aunt won't even learn how to use a microwave.

She has a mentally handicapped boyfriend. When she's done eating all the family groceries, she eats his.

It's as easy as pie. My aunt refused to work or behave, and the government gave her taxpayer money for decades. She's considered a narcissist personality disorder. And she is only bad because government continues to reward her for being lazy. Since grandma died, my aunt has gotten meaner and more demanding.

And my aunt is happy having what little sustenance she can milk out of America. Liberals are no different, and one day when they can live like she does, they too will remorselessly rule over us, demanding every service, flattery and attention.

How will you live with yourself knowing what you didn't do for your children?

Some guy makes a video bashing Hillary Clinton, and now the media is in awe at how it got everyone's attention.

It's called free you idiots. We don't have to listen to you old geezers, your stupid commercials, your leftist narcissism or your right-wing overreaction to everything as-if it was narcissism. Of course people are going to watch. What you monkeys can't figure out is that people actually work from 8-5 everyday and don't have time to watch the garbage you produce.

And now for a video that actually matters to our future.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-y0MdPXslo

Let's see you bureaucrats run against this man.

Why statutory authority goes too friggin far:
 
Tacoma, WASH
Hannity discusses the case:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,259124,00.html
A reporter believes the teacher preyed on the student:
http://www.thenewstribune.com/opinion/story/6414358p-5718555c.html

Context

Statutory authority has gone haywire. Rebekah Todd, a 25 year old public school teacher, was sentenced to 6 months in prison for having sex with a student.

The original charges were first- and second-degree sexual misconduct with a minor. The negotiated plea was for the charge of attempted second-degree assault. The judge gave her the usual sentence for people who plead guilty to that charge.

*  Both first- and second-degree sexual misconduct specifically refer to abusing a position of authority to engage in sex with someone under 18. First-degree specifically refers to intercourse, and second-degree specifically refers to sexual contact.

*  Attempted second-degree assault means trying to physically harm another person.

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.093
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.096
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.36.021

Introduction to the Two Problems

As soon as government gets involved in people's lives, government wants to tell them how to live it. In Washington, regulations apparently (yes, I'm assuming) prohibit persons in positions of authority from having relationships with those under their authority. If you do not see the hypocracy of such a regulation, then your brain is dead.

How can government tell people not to have relationships by virtue of their profession being a licensed practice? Simple: government creates a privilege: the practice. Next, government assumes you have no rights, and tells you in pages and pages of legal code what you can and cannot do. Finally, government oversteps its statutory authority by criminally punishing you for breaking the terms of the deal instead of ending the deal.

In this case, the prosecution painted the picture of an evil woman abusing her position of authority to compel a student of hers into a relationship. That would be coercion if any real crime happened. It didn't. Two people had sex, the government came in to stick its nose where it doesn't belong, and the boy ratted on his teacher. Considering she performed oral sex on him, one has to wonder whether the boy coerced the teacher into committing sexual acts.

The first problem is that people have too much power over each other and no rights:  privileges. The second problem is that statutory regulations are being written into criminal law, but we'll focus on the first problem so you get the full picture in order.

Example of the Problem

Here's a good newsgroup article explaining what special rules health practitioners have to live by; they can't have relationships with clients unless two years pass from the time the practitioner worked on the patient AND etc etc etc.

http://lists.powerblogs.com/pipermail/volokh/2007-January/008358.html

I'll quote the main point and the summary.

"  you may get disciplined even if the allegedly wronged party is entirely
   on your side (in fact, is now your loving spouse)." 

"  But the trouble here is that the rules go vastly further than these
   special situations, and vastly undervalue the countervailing reasons
   to limit regulation -- people's right to choose whom to date, have sex
   with, and marry, even including their dental hygienists, opticians,
   and the like"

Basically government is saying, "You can work 80 hours a week, but you can't have a relationship with any of your clients. Good luck getting married. Now get to work."

Summary

Once government owns your right to procreate, government can tell you when, where, how, and who you are going to be procreating with. When you fail to follow these rules, a prosecutor can do you a favor by reducing the charges. Favors are what America is all about.

First the government does you the favor of owning your right to have sex since you're too stupid to do it correctly. The government privileges you with a position of authority. Next, the government treats you like a teenager by telling you not to have sex unless it says you can. Then the government punishes you like a violent person if you don't follow the rules. Finally, people like Sean Hannity gawk at you for not having the sense to avoid punishment.

And last but not least, the government accuses you of abusing your authority.

Imagine Monica Lewinsky being jailed for what she did with Bill Clinton. Both Bill and Todd's accuser had positions of power. Todd's accuser was a minor possessing the privilege to jail any adult who wanted a relationship, and Bill Clinton had the power to fire Lewinsky. Both Todd's accuser and Lewinsky wanted a relationship, and one can just as easily accuse both these boys of coercing the girls into these acts.

You could argue that Todd's accuser's power is due to the fact that the teacher wanted a relationship, but you would still be wrong. Don't argue with Daddy. In all these cases, people have government-granted power over each other that they should not ever have, and you are perfectly happy with that.

Government also continues to assume radio talk show hosts have no right to speak. Hence, the possibility of the Fairness Doctrine returning to law. Doesn't it make sense for government to have some constitutionally-mandated restrictions on what rights it cannot take from us in a licensing deal? Or should government own all our rights and privilege us with them under threat of jail?

Recommendation

Quit creating privileges. Give people back their rights, and leave them alone.

As I have alluded to you in my earlier posts, I am an INTJ personality.

I think I finally understand you socializers. You people don't necessarily like small talk anymore than I do. You network because you want to live. Some of you love it.

Well let's go through a few things then.

#1.  NO Daddy is not going to network!

I do not have to be a socializer. I can pay you extroverts to do what you love doing, and you'll do a better job of it than I will. Take a look at Thom Singer:  www.thomsinger.com. This man is a professional networker with the right attitude for meeting people.

So all you INTJs better follow my strategy. There's no point in forcing yourself to playing the reputation game when you can just as easily acquire a professional's services. You might think, "How are we going to get in the door of a company if our networker doesn't know or like them?" Now why would we want to do that?

Mwahahaha!

My past experience with having personal handlers has been wonderful. I like these socializers because they're energetic, excited, and effective. I could never do what they do. They are the best, and I feel good about paying them for a valuable service. I encourage others to do the same.

If you're wondering how to find these people, then you probably have no idea what you're looking for. I suggest finding a local Quixtar chapter and attending national functions. You'll know the rhinoceros when you see him. He's the one who has all the fun. The rest seem like zombies compared to him.

And for all the naysayers who said I had to change to live, thanks for nothing. I am not only going to succeed, but you're not going to get a dime of my business because your customer service skills are more gutteral than Lamb of God. Why don't you both learn how to talk before you start trying to sing?

#2.  I enjoy moments of megalomania...so what?

Just because I can laugh at the brilliance of my own schemes and have an attitude doesn't mean I'm Tom Cruise. But if you still think I'm a bad person, then you can always find company in liberals. Sean Hannity talks to them all the time. Mmmm...doesn't he look like he's having fun?! :) NYahahahaha!

#3.  Good night

Feel free to e-mail me so I can practice pressing the delete key.

God bless the people persons.

The problem is not the economic weather such as speculation. If government cared that one or two businesses would squander financial instruments, then it would disband the two major political parties.

The problem is that people do not trust the free market to deliver goods and services. They expect government to guarantee~ the flow of goods and services.

Translation:  ever play an MMOG where the kids buy up all the items and resell them at a higher cost? This is called speculation. People do it for one reason:  money. The only difference between speculation and retail sales is that a retailer does not corner the market and cause prices to quickly escalate.

Since people are dependent on money and the market for their survival, they are concerned about the stability of that market. And what do people do when they're concerned about something? They look to government. This is the root of the problem. People aren't financially independent of society:  they're economic conscripts.

Leave it to Daddy to know what the kids have gotten themselves into.

Socialists love the way things are. They have illegalized any possibility of independence through zoning and central planning; you couldn't grow a tomato or chop a tree without a government permit much less raise enough food and electricity to live on. As long as you're dependent on the market, socialists know you are dependent on government, and them, to guarantee your existence.

People accept their peon-ship as "a move forward, away from farming and remedial labor." Play SimCity a few times. Central planners design your civilized vassal life: the building you will live in, the road you will drive on to work, the education level of your family, and the forms of entertainment you will have access to.

Yeah, you're free. Free like a couple of fish in the oven.

Having solar generators would remind you that "No, Mr. Power Company, I really don't have to pay you this month. I can turn you off." Of course, you're still going to want cable TV, internet and cellphone service, and the electricity to power other luxuries, but the point isn't to own everything. The point is to own enough to survive with.

You don't even need to grow every spice, vegetable, fruit, and form of meat that there is; you can trade. You don't even have to work the garden; you can hire mexicans or kids. If one solar generator doesn't produce enough electricity, buy another one or a better one. If dogs, cats, squirrels, and hurricanes are a threat to your property, take security measures.

Now you take that solar generator, and you get a Rinnai water heater system to reduce power consumption. You can do this if you own a house. You can't if you're in a trailer park, a condo, or an apartment complex. You need a home and land.

Central planners need to create a new zoning that enables residents to have a greenhouse, power generators, and water boiler air conditioning systems (the one Bush has). Just imagine the value added to public roads if people, instead of just driving out to pick up groceries, can haul groceries to a farmer's market for trade.

On a side note, FDA enforcement officials would have a nightmare keeping tabs on a neighborhood's home-grown garden variety produce. I think growers would want to get FDA seals of approval though, so local agencies would expand. Growers could compete with grocery stores by virtue of financial independence.

Wonder how the government would tax these people, who don't have to have a job, who can live scot-free off the means of their own labor? I've never heard of a government that can't figure out how to tax something. Have you? Government should refrain from property and income taxes though.

The planners also need to set various levels of tolerance for environmental pollution. Chickens, cows and other things stink, and they should be on the outskirts not downtown. They have these classifications, but no one appears to use them for anything other than building more anthills. Hey, there's also fire hazards, architectural requirements, and other things to consider. I'm not saying throw away central planning.

I'm saying central planning should support independence rather than obstruct it.

I just explained capitalism to you. You weren't afraid of anyone squandering pig butts or cornering the pig butt market. That doesn't scare you. You're worried about stocks, bonds, and industries being seized by greedy people because you're 100% dependent on the status quo for your existence. No one should live that way.

So if I give you more options, you will eventually think about them. How about the choice not to work for somebody else?

------------------------------------------

Food ain't hard. You can slap pizza dough together in about 30 minutes. You probably don't know how, which is why you haven't tried. If you're like me, your standards are so high that you need a good year to figure out how to meet them. Yeah, I got your attention now. We can live forever on pizza, can't we? Cmon nobody likes flipping burgers. Everyone loves slapping pizza.

Flour's only $1 a bag. Yeast, water, olive oil, eggs, sugar, and salt aren't that high. Jump right in. Reading the Encyclopizza (google it) as I practiced has helped. My dough is near rocking, and it'd be better if I had my own homegrown stuff.

See, nobody gets excited over the food channel...but everyone gets excited about pizza. Pizza is capitalism.

 Hannity and Colmes

Sean Hannity and Florida prosecutor Pam Bondi characterize the teacher-student affair epidemic by using terms such as "predator." Just when are you old prudes going to learn? If you wouldn't misjudge so often I would have nothing to say.

That teacher did not kidnap, forcibly rape, or physically abuse anyone. She ran around on her husband with a bunch of teenage boys, so ya'll locked her up in her house with her husband. What does that solve anyway? If a male would do the same thing with teenage girls, you people would give him life in prison.

Lemme tell you what the big picture is. This woman's behavior shows how miserable she is. She went through college, got married, got a job, and threw it all away having flings with younger boys. We've seen this story before, people. It happens all the time.

Remember what Jesus did when He discovered an adulteress that the townsfolk were ready to stone to death? See, instead of understanding the nature of the crime, you loony wannabe-conservatives are out for blood. Just learn your lesson this time, and teach your children about relationships so they know better than to have affairs. Why does Daddy always have to correct you?

And for you youngsters out there...

I want to appeal to you. You may feel that having a relationship is fun, but the truth is you're unhappy: you need somebody else to feel happy. Now see, this teacher didn't value her education or her marriage. She did good things, but she didn't care about them. Instead, she wanted to get away from them.

Isn't that unhappy? The truth is that no relationship lasts when a person is unhappy. Unhappy people try very hard to control everything and hide their unhappiness. They don't know when to let go. Teachers try to control their futures through unions. Codependents try to control their partners' every move. It's all the same unhappiness that drives them to act that way.

When you're unhappy, you force yourself to do everything. This teacher probably forced herself through college to meet others' expectations. She probably worked very hard, and she may have come from a family that did not allow her the freedom to pursue her own happiness. She's only 23.

The driven person works very hard for a while and then peters out. The dedicated person endures. Don't drive yourself. I know that's easy for me to say, but the fact is you need help. You don't need to be loading yourself with life's responsibilities without taking care of your first responsibility: you. Neither God nor man wants a castle built by misery.

Take this time to reflect on yourself. Read Stephen Covey's The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People.

And stick with Daddy. Daddy makes you laugh.